These two platforms are less similar than a category listing suggests. Streak is strongest at indicator-driven strategies on equities, with deep broker-native integration. Arthalab is built for multi-leg NIFTY and SENSEX option structures. Most traders will find the choice obvious once they write down what they actually trade.
Quick comparison
| Arthalab | Streak | |
|---|---|---|
| Built around | Multi-leg index option structures | Indicator conditions on equities and F&O |
| Markets | NIFTY and SENSEX index options | Equities, futures and options across segments |
| Typical strategy | Short straddle, iron condor, calendar spread | RSI, moving-average and breakout entries |
| Scanning across instruments | Not applicable — two indices | Yes, a core strength |
| Pricing model | One plan, everything included | Tiered |
| Static IP | Included in the plan | Depends on your setup |
| Broker model | Several brokers, you pick one | Tight integration, strongest inside its broker ecosystem |
| Analyst strategies | SEBI-registered RA strategies, included | Published strategies available |
The real dividing line: what you trade
Streak's natural territory
Streak is built for a workflow that starts with a condition on a chart. Scan a universe of stocks, find the ones where an indicator condition is true, and act on them. If your idea sounds like "buy when RSI crosses 30 on any of these fifty stocks", Streak is designed around exactly that shape.
It is also broker-native in a way Arthalab is not. If you are already inside that broker's ecosystem, the integration is tighter and the setup shorter — fewer moving parts between your account and your orders.
Arthalab's natural territory
Arthalab is built for a workflow that starts with a structure. You are not scanning for instruments — there are two indices. You are deciding how many legs, which strikes, which expiry, when to enter and exit, and how each leg is protected.
If your idea sounds like "sell the at-the-money straddle at 09:20, 30-point stop loss per leg, exit at 15:10, square off everything if the combined loss hits a limit", that is the shape the builder is designed for.
Indicators
Streak is organised around scanning a stock universe for indicator conditions, which is a different job from the one Arthalab does. We have not bolted a screener onto an options platform, because a half-built screener would serve nobody well.
Arthalab's option strategies are driven by structure, time and price levels rather than by indicator scans across instruments. For index option sellers that is usually what is wanted — most of these strategies care about where the index is relative to a strike and what time it is, not about an oscillator reading.
An equity momentum trader is simply not who this product is built for, and we would rather say so than sell a poor fit.
Where the two overlap
The comparison is clearer once you set aside what both do identically, which is most of the plumbing.
- Neither holds your money. Orders go to your own broker account on both.
- Both require a daily broker login. Imposed by brokers, not platforms.
- Both require a registered IP for live trading. Same reason.
- Both backtest and both paper trade. The mechanics differ; the purpose does not.
- Neither promises returns, and any platform that implies otherwise is worth avoiding.
What is left after removing all of that is the genuine difference: what kind of strategy each one is shaped to express.
What switching costs in practice
If you are on one and considering the other, the realistic effort is worth knowing before you decide.
- Rebuild the strategy. There is no transfer format. For an index options strategy this is minutes; for a scanned equity strategy it is not possible on Arthalab at all.
- Reuse the broker connection. Your API app, key and whitelisted address work either way.
- Paper trade the rebuilt version for a cycle. Confirm it behaves the way the original did before trusting it.
- Square off on the old platform before going live on the new one. Two systems acting on one broker account, unaware of each other, is the one genuinely dangerous configuration.
Step four is the only one that can hurt. The rest is an afternoon.
Pricing and what is bundled
Arthalab is ₹599 against a ₹1,499 list price, plus 18% GST, for 30 days, with everything in the one plan: both indices, a dedicated static IP, 10 backtests a day, up to 3 simultaneous strategies, Research Analyst strategies, paper trading, options analysis and buckets.
Streak's pricing is tiered and changes; check their own page. As always, the two things to verify are which tier permits live deployment and whether a static IP is included anywhere.
A dynamic IP will not work for broker API trading, so if neither your platform nor your broker arrangement provides a fixed address, that is a cost and a setup task you are taking on yourself.
Backtesting
Both platforms backtest. The difference is what is being tested — an indicator condition across instruments, versus a multi-leg structure on one index.
Arthalab gives 10 backtest credits a day, resetting at midnight IST, with failed runs refunded and no rollover. A bucket backtest costs one credit per active strategy. That is enough for genuine iteration including the fragility checks that distinguish a robust strategy from a fitted one, but it is a cap.
Whichever platform you use, the metrics that matter are the same and the headline profit number is the least informative of them. Live results will be somewhat worse than any backtest, on every platform, for structural reasons.
Operational reality
Both platforms sit behind the same broker-imposed requirements: a daily API login and a registered IP address. Neither can waive them.
On Arthalab, bots also switch off after each market close and need starting again — deploying and starting are separate actions. That is a deliberate safety default rather than an oversight, and the scheduler can automate the start if you want it gone.
When an indicator-and-scan platform may suit you
- You trade equities, or your strategy spans a universe of stocks.
- Your entries are indicator conditions — RSI, moving averages, breakouts.
- You want to scan and screen as part of the workflow.
- You are already deep in its broker ecosystem and want the tightest possible integration.
Why traders choose Arthalab
- You trade NIFTY or SENSEX index options.
- Your strategies are multi-leg structures with per-leg risk rules.
- You want the static IP handled for you.
- You want analyst strategies included rather than separately subscribed.
- You want one plan with nothing held back behind a tier.
A concrete example of the mismatch
The clearest way to see the difference is to take one idea and ask how each platform would express it.
Idea A: buy any Nifty 50 stock when its 20-day moving average crosses above its 50-day, and exit on the reverse cross. This is a scan across fifty instruments driven by an indicator condition. Streak expresses it naturally. Arthalab cannot express it at all — there is no stock universe and no indicator scan.
Idea B: at 09:20, sell the NIFTY at-the-money call and put of the current weekly expiry, put a 30-point stop loss on each leg, close both if either stops out, and square off everything at 15:10. This is a structure with timing and per-leg risk rules. Arthalab expresses it directly in the builder. Expressing it on an indicator-first platform means working against the grain of the tool.
What this tells you
Neither idea is better. They are different kinds of trading, and the platform that fits one fits the other badly. Write your own idea in that form and the answer usually becomes obvious.
Deciding in ten minutes
1
Write one sentence describing your strategy
The instrument in that sentence settles most of this.
2
Ask whether it starts from a scan or a structure
Scan across instruments leans Streak. Build a structure on one index leans Arthalab.
3
Price the whole setup
Include live deployment and a static IP on whichever side does not bundle them.
4
Trial it
Arthalab's 3-day trial gives full access. Build your actual strategy, not a demo one.
5
Paper trade before funding
Two expiry cycles minimum, including a trending day and a gap open.
If you are still deciding what to trade at all, paper trading is the cheapest way to find out — no broker, no IP, no capital.
The short version
These two are shaped for different kinds of trading, and the instrument you trade settles most of the decision.
- Streak is strongest at indicator conditions scanned across equities
- Arthalab is built for multi-leg NIFTY and SENSEX option structures
- Neither holds your money; orders go to your own broker account
- Both need a daily broker login and a registered IP for live trading
- Strategies do not transfer between them — you rebuild
Write your strategy in one sentence. If it names a stock universe or an indicator scan, Streak fits. If it names legs, strikes and times on an index, Arthalab does.
Frequently asked questions
Not directly — there is no transfer format, so you rebuild. For an index options strategy that is minutes. For a scanned equity strategy it is not possible on Arthalab at all.
Running both platforms live against the same broker account at once. Two systems unaware of each other acting on one account is the genuinely dangerous configuration. Square off before you switch.
They test different things — an indicator condition across instruments versus a multi-leg structure on one index. The metrics that matter are the same on both, and live results trail a backtest on either.
They are built for different jobs. Streak is organised around scanning equities for indicator conditions; Arthalab is purpose-built for multi-leg NIFTY and SENSEX option structures, which is why its defaults and workflow suit index options traders without configuration.
No. NIFTY and SENSEX index options on NSE and BSE only.
Its option strategies are driven by structure, time and price levels rather than indicator scans across a stock universe. If indicator screening is central to your approach, Streak fits better.
Arthalab is ₹599 plus GST for 30 days, everything included. Streak is tiered and changes — check their page, and add a static IP wherever it is not bundled.
Zerodha, Upstox, Groww or Dhan for live trading, with XTS available on request. Backtesting and paper trading need no broker.
Yes — some traders run equity strategies on one platform and index option strategies on another. They are not mutually exclusive.
No, and any platform that implies otherwise should be treated with suspicion. Both give you tools to build and test strategies; neither promises an outcome.
Start with a free 3-day trial
Build a strategy, backtest it and run it on paper — no broker, no IP and no money needed to try it.
